Archive for February, 2011

Can You Afford To Call The Fire Brigade?

Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011

The Fire Industry Association (FIA) has warned that if the Fire and Rescue Services charge to attend false alarms, as proposed in the new Localism Bill, it could have a serious impact on fire safety in England and Wales.

FIA CEO, Graham Ellicott, comments: “If Fire and Rescue Services charge for false alarm attendance they run the risk that companies will switch off their fire alarm systems to avoid being fined”, which could have serious, potentially life-threatening implications.

The Localism Bill, which is now before the Parliamentary Bill Committee, is part of the Government’s much publicised devolvement of powers to councils and neighbourhoods, and it includes the proposal that Fire and Rescue Services are to be given the power to charge for attending false alarms.

With recent fire cutbacks, of course, the Fire and Rescue Services want to minimise time wasting due to recurring false alarms but the increased fire risk to buildings and the financial and environmental consequences must be considered. If people decide to turn fire detection and alarms off because the alternative is a fine, this is a very dangerous route to take.

Graham Ellicott adds: “If the day comes when charging is levied for false alarm attendance who will the bill be sent to? This is not a clear cut issue as many have assumed that it would be the owner of the building, which in itself could lead to the serious consequences I have already alluded to. However, in the past, bills were sent to the transmitter of the alarm signal – that is the Alarm Receiving Centre (ARC). If that is to be the case again, then given the ARCs current view of the ever changing way that the brigades are treating false alarms, they have to strongly consider whether they want to be involved with the fire sector, especially as the security sector is larger and better regulated!”

Fire Alarm Installations are one of those items that tend to be forgotten about until a crisis strikes. All buildings whether publicly or privately owned have a legal requirement for a minimum level of protection.

Business owners need to follow the outcome of the Localism Bill very carefully to understand any potential liability resulting from false alarms at their premises.  If a company has a history of false alarms, now is the time to get professional review the existing system.  Contact a professional installer who will be happy to review an existing alarm system.

Going For Gold

Monday, February 21st, 2011

Last week the 2012 organising committee released details of the times and dates for all of the events at the London games.  At the same time they launched a countdown clock, it shows the games will start in just over 500 days.

The games require incredible planning and one area that will be coming under intense scrutiny is security. The games have a massive security budget of £750 million and at its peak will require 9,000 police officers per day. With a predicted security risk level of ‘severe’ it is no surprise that technology will also play a big part in the overall security operation and that includes CCTV.

The Metropolitan police are suggesting that they could develop a sophisticated network comprising of 500,000 CCTV cameras.  This would include the ‘Mets’ own network of 10,000 cameras, combined with the ANPR, traffic and congestion cameras from across the city. The network would also use ‘private’ cameras in use at places like shopping centres. The force said it was looking at how various CCTV networks could be used and that planning was underway.

This ‘super’ network would be operated from a command centre, in London, by military, police and intelligence services. This is where new technology will be required as all of the information will need to be used to ensure only relevant data is fed to the command centre. It is understood the command centre would remain in place after the Olympics.

Olympic security coordinator, assistant commissioner Tarique Ghaffur, gave an update on the security planning he envisaged for the 2012 Games.

He said: “Efforts focus on the capabilities we currently have and how these can be used efficiently to make London safer both now and during Games time.

“A good example of this is how the current capabilities of various CCTV networks might be harnessed and integrated in London within the current legislative framework, to deliver greater effect in mitigating specific threats as part of the Olympic security effort.”

Dee Doocey, London Assembly member, said it was important to be clear that CCTV cameras were not a substitute for officers.

“We must do everything possible to ensure both athletes and those attending the games are safe and CCTV (cameras) undoubtedly play a key role, but they are a tool, they are certainly not a substitute for police officers.”

Killerbytedesign Valid XHTML & CSS | SEO